Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpvlKrxg/LengthOfFiniteLists_nosorts_noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:

active(length(nil)) → mark(0)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(length(x₁)) = x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 1
POL(ok(x₁)) = x₁
POL(proper(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(top(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tt) = 0
POL(zeros) = 0

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → U12¹(tt, L)
LENGTH(ok(X)) → LENGTH(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → S(length(L))
ACTIVE(length(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → U11¹(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
PROPER(length(X)) → LENGTH(proper(X))
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2)) → U11¹(active(X1), X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(length(X)) → LENGTH(active(X))
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → U12¹(proper(X1), proper(X2))
U11¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → U11¹(tt, L)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
U12¹(mark(X1), X2) → U12¹(X1, X2)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2)) → U12¹(active(X1), X2)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U12¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U12¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → LENGTH(L)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → U12¹(tt, L)
LENGTH(ok(X)) → LENGTH(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → S(length(L))
ACTIVE(length(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → U11¹(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
PROPER(length(X)) → LENGTH(proper(X))
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2)) → U11¹(active(X1), X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(length(X)) → LENGTH(active(X))
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → U12¹(proper(X1), proper(X2))
U11¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → U11¹(tt, L)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
U12¹(mark(X1), X2) → U12¹(X1, X2)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2)) → U12¹(active(X1), X2)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U12¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U12¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → LENGTH(L)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 8 SCCs with 17 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(ok(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [15] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its argument. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(ok(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

LENGTH(ok(X)) → LENGTH(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(mark(X1), X2) → U12¹(X1, X2)
U12¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U12¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(mark(X1), X2) → U12¹(X1, X2)
U12¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U12¹(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

U12¹(mark(X1), X2) → U12¹(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
U12¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U12¹(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

U11¹(mark(X1), X2) → U11¹(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
U11¹(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → U11¹(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(length(X)) → PROPER(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(U12(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(U11(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(length(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(length(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(length(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ Narrowing

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X)) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:

TOP(mark(tt)) → TOP(ok(tt))
TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(mark(zeros)) → TOP(ok(zeros))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(mark(nil)) → TOP(ok(nil))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(mark(0)) → TOP(ok(0))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ Narrowing

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(mark(tt)) → TOP(ok(tt))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(mark(zeros)) → TOP(ok(zeros))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(mark(nil)) → TOP(ok(nil))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(mark(0)) → TOP(ok(0))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 4 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ Narrowing

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ Narrowing

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X)) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:

TOP(ok(U11(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(U12(tt, x0)))
TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(ok(zeros)) → TOP(mark(cons(0, zeros)))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(length(cons(x0, x1)))) → TOP(mark(U11(tt, x1)))
TOP(ok(U12(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(s(length(x0))))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ Narrowing

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ Narrowing

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(length(cons(x0, x1)))) → TOP(mark(U11(tt, x1)))
TOP(ok(U11(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(U12(tt, x0)))
TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(ok(zeros)) → TOP(mark(cons(0, zeros)))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(U12(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(s(length(x0))))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(ok(zeros)) → TOP(mark(cons(0, zeros)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(length(cons(x0, x1)))) → TOP(mark(U11(tt, x1)))
TOP(ok(U11(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(U12(tt, x0)))
TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(U12(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(s(length(x0))))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(TOP(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = 0
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(length(x₁)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(ok(x₁)) = x₁
POL(proper(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 0
POL(zeros) = 1

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ Narrowing

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ Narrowing

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(length(cons(x0, x1)))) → TOP(mark(U11(tt, x1)))
TOP(ok(U11(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(U12(tt, x0)))
TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(U12(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(s(length(x0))))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(ok(length(cons(x0, x1)))) → TOP(mark(U11(tt, x1)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(U11(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(U12(tt, x0)))
TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(U12(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(s(length(x0))))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(TOP(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = 1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(length(x₁)) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(ok(x₁)) = x₁
POL(proper(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 0
POL(zeros) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ Narrowing

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ Narrowing

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(U11(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(U12(tt, x0)))
TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(U12(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(s(length(x0))))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(ok(U11(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(U12(tt, x0)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(U12(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(s(length(x0))))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(TOP(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(length(x₁)) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(ok(x₁)) = x₁
POL(proper(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 1
POL(zeros) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ Narrowing

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ Narrowing

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(U12(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(s(length(x0))))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(ok(U12(tt, x0))) → TOP(mark(s(length(x0))))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TOP(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = x1
U12(x1, x2) = U12
proper(x1) = proper
ok(x1) = x1
U11(x1, x2) = U11
active(x1) = active
length(x1) = length
s(x1) = s
cons(x1, x2) = cons
tt = tt
zeros = zeros
0 = 0
nil = nil

Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:

U12 > [proper, active, s, 0] > U11
U12 > [proper, active, s, 0] > length
zeros > cons > tt > [proper, active, s, 0] > U11
zeros > cons > tt > [proper, active, s, 0] > length

Status:

active: []
cons: multiset
tt: multiset
zeros: multiset
U12: multiset
proper: multiset
U11: multiset
s: multiset
length: multiset
0: multiset
nil: multiset

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ Narrowing

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ Narrowing

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(ok(s(x0))) → TOP(s(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(length(x0))) → TOP(length(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(length(x0))) → TOP(length(active(x0)))
TOP(mark(s(x0))) → TOP(s(proper(x0)))
TOP(ok(U12(x0, x1))) → TOP(U12(active(x0), x1))
TOP(ok(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(active(x0), x1))
TOP(mark(cons(x0, x1))) → TOP(cons(proper(x0), proper(x1)))
TOP(mark(U11(x0, x1))) → TOP(U11(proper(x0), proper(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(length(X)) → length(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
length(mark(X)) → mark(length(X))
length(ok(X)) → ok(length(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
U12(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U12(X1, X2))
U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U12(X1, X2))
U11(mark(X1), X2) → mark(U11(X1, X2))
U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(U11(X1, X2))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(U11(X1, X2)) → U11(active(X1), X2)
active(U12(X1, X2)) → U12(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(length(X)) → length(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.